EU AI Act
High-risk classification, record keeping, transparency, human oversight, robustness evidence, and conformity-assessment workflows.
Review the EU AI Act guideUse these guides to connect regulatory expectations with runtime policy enforcement, human review, audit records, and deployment choices.
Each guide addresses a distinct jurisdiction, regulated audience, and review question. The pages explain what the framework asks teams to demonstrate, where AxonFlow can provide supporting evidence, and where organizational controls remain outside the product.
High-risk classification, record keeping, transparency, human oversight, robustness evidence, and conformity-assessment workflows.
Review the EU AI Act guideOrient shared platform teams across RBI FREE-AI, SEBI AI/ML responsibilities, and the broader Indian data-protection context.
Open the India overviewSystem inventory, validation records, incident governance, emergency controls, and board-level evidence for banking and payments.
Review RBI FREE-AIResponsibility for client data and outputs, AI/ML reporting, retention, readiness, and audit evidence for securities-market firms.
Review SEBI guidanceFairness, ethics, accountability, transparency, materiality assessments, inventories, and human intervention in financial services.
Review the Singapore guidePersonal-data governance, banking AI oversight, payment-system controls, incident evidence, and cross-border transfer records.
Review the Indonesia guideThe landing site, technical documentation, and Trust Center are intentionally related without repeating the same page three times.
Start here to understand applicability, regulatory status, practical obligations, AxonFlow's role, and the limits of that role.
Use the docs for endpoint families, identity headers, payloads, deployment modes, tier boundaries, and evidence-export workflows.
Open compliance documentationUse the Trust Center for concrete security features, deployment boundaries, telemetry behavior, certification status, and disclosure channels.
Open the Trust CenterAxonFlow governs AI requests and tool actions at runtime. It can produce evidence that supports a broader compliance program, but the complete program also depends on people, process, system design, model governance, and legal interpretation.
| Control need | Runtime contribution | Evidence available | Organizational responsibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Policy enforcement | Evaluate requests and tool calls against system and tenant policies. | Policy decisions, matched rules, outcomes, and request context. | Define approved use cases, thresholds, and accountable owners. |
| Human oversight | Pause configured high-risk actions for review before execution. | Approval status, reviewer identity, timestamps, and decision history. | Set reviewer authority, escalation paths, and separation of duties. |
| Data protection | Detect and act on configured PII patterns before model or tool access. | Detection category, policy action, and governed request record. | Classify data, choose lawful processing grounds, and configure deployment boundaries. |
| Traceability | Record governed LLM and connector activity with correlation context. | Decision and execution records for investigation and export. | Set retention, downstream logging, access review, and incident procedures. |
| Emergency intervention | Apply scoped or broader circuit-breaker controls where licensed and configured. | Trip, reset, actor, reason, and affected scope. | Authorize activation, rehearse recovery, and own business continuity. |
These guides describe technical support for a control environment. Legal and compliance teams must validate the complete system against the current law, regulator guidance, contractual obligations, and deployment facts.
Use the Evaluation license to assess policy enforcement, human review, evidence records, and deployment boundaries before a regulated rollout.